Yep, they have mine.
The MAC is broadcast anyway (hence the total waste of time turning off SSID Broadcast), so it's pretty much in the public domain.
I'm pretty much in the camp that closing your wireless network (as in, not broadcasting your SSID) is really no longer a real option when it comes to wireless security.
It's just my opinion but my contention is that "Closed" networks, MAC access control lists, and reduction in transmission power are all more "feel good" security rather than real security. All these various approaches are dated and mistakenly lead to overconfidence.
WPA2 is - again, IMHO - the only real option if you value wireless security.
When I'm out and about and need to set up wireless access for my customers I tell them not to worry about broadcasting the SSID and I set up WPA2 encryption. This will be more secure than a closed WEP encrypted network. Closing the network makes it very difficult for neighbouring networks to see which channels are free thus causing potential interference problems.
Another thing to consider is that a closed network is still broadcasting and therefore is detectable (regardless of whether it is broadcasting a SSID). If someone was determined to hack into your network, then not broadcasting the SSID and MAC address access control is not going to stop them.
WPA2 is virtually uncrackable (only really vunerable to a dictionary attack if a real word is used as a password) and therefore will stop the casual user and the determined hacker.
MAC addresses are sent unencrypted and therefore can be picked up and read by a determined hacker. Not only that, with many ethernet devices you can now very easily change the MAC address to a different one, so making it very easy to spoof the MAC address and fool a wireless base station into believing that you are an authenticated client.
Of course, if one is really worried, don't use wireless just use wires.
Kryten
PS - Yup, my router has also been mapped.
